Democratization of the Internet: Impact on Critics and the Quality of Artistic Expression

Critics have long played a pivotal role in shaping the standards and quality of artistic expression. Through their insightful evaluations, discerning assessments, and thoughtful analyses, they contribute to the development and appreciation of art. However, with the democratization of the internet, new challenges have emerged, impacting the role of critics and potentially lowering the standards and quality of the art. This article explores the crucial role of critics, their influence on artistic standards, and the dangers posed by the democratization of the internet.

Art Critics serve as trusted guides and interpreters in the artistic world. Drawing upon their expertise and extensive knowledge, they provide valuable insights into the aesthetic, technical, and conceptual aspects of artistic works. Their evaluations and assessments offer a critical lens through which artists, audiences, and the broader cultural landscape can understand and appreciate art. By engaging in thoughtful critique and discourse, critics contribute to the establishment and refinement of artistic standards, pushing the boundaries of creativity and excellence.

The advent of the internet has ushered in an era of artistic democracy which has revolutionized the way art is consumed, shared, and evaluated. While this democratization has brought about positive changes, it has also posed significant challenges for art critics:

1. Proliferation of Uninformed Opinions: The internet has provided a platform for anyone to voice their opinions on art, leading to an overwhelming influx of uninformed viewpoints. While inclusivity is valuable, this abundance of uninformed perspectives can make it difficult to discern valuable criticism and hinder the recognition of quality works.
2. Loss of Gatekeeping and Expertise: In the digital age, the distinction between professional art critics and amateur opinions has been blurred. With easy access to self-publishing platforms, individuals lacking expertise can present themselves as critics, diluting the authority of informed analysis. This erosion of expertise undermines the credibility and trust in professional critics, lowering the overall standards of art criticism.
3. Influence of Popularity Metrics on Artistic Recognition: Social media platforms and online metrics such as likes, shares, and views have become significant factors in determining artistic recognition and success. However, this emphasis on popularity can overshadow critical analysis and thoughtful evaluation, potentially leading to a focus on superficial qualities rather than artistic depth and merit.
4. Fragmentation of Critical Consensus: The internet has allowed for the expression of diverse perspectives and tastes in art. While this diversity is beneficial, it has also made it challenging to establish a cohesive critical consensus. Fragmented discourse and the lack of widely accepted measures of quality can impede the development of artistic standards.

The Impact on Artistic Standards and Quality: The democratization of the internet, combined with the aforementioned challenges, can lead to a decline in artistic standards and quality:

1. Diminished Discourse and Analysis: The brevity and immediacy of online platforms can discourage in-depth critical discourse and analysis. Quick reactions and soundbites often take precedence over thoughtful contemplation, limiting the depth of artistic evaluation and appreciation.
2. Dilution of Professional Standards: The ease of self-publishing and the blurring of lines between amateur and professional critics can result in a devaluation of professional standards. Informed analysis and expertise can be overshadowed by subjective personal opinions, leading to a loss of trust in critical assessment and a lower overall quality of art criticism.
3. Influence of Populist and Commercial Interests: The internet’s accessibility and popularity-driven culture can lead to the amplification of populist and commercially driven viewpoints. This can undermine the exploration of unconventional and challenging artistic expressions, favoring mainstream and market-friendly works instead.

Navigating the Challenges and Upholding Artistic Standards: To address the dangers posed by the democratization of the internet and uphold artistic standards, several measures can be taken:

1. Promoting Critical Literacy: Encouraging critical literacy among audiences can help discern quality works amidst the proliferation of uninformed opinions. Educating the public about the value of informed art criticism fosters a deeper understanding of artistic concepts, techniques, and principles.
2. Embracing Diversity in Critical Voices: Encouraging diverse perspectives in art criticism enriches the discourse and prevents the homogenization of standards. Inclusivity ensures that a broader range of voices and experiences are represented, leading to a more vibrant and inclusive artistic landscape.
3. Fostering Constructive Dialogue: Promoting collaboration and constructive dialogue between critics, artists, and audiences can deepen understanding and appreciation of art. Engaging in respectful discussions helps bridge the gap between different perspectives and maintains the integrity of critical analysis.
4. Encouraging Discernment and Engagement: Promoting discernment and critical engagement among audiences helps counter the impact of uninformed opinions. Encouraging individuals to seek out informed and knowledgeable critics cultivates a discerning and appreciative audience base.
5. Redefining the Relationship between Critics and Artists: Nurturing a healthy and symbiotic relationship between critics and artists can foster artistic growth. Constructive feedback and dialogue between the two can help artists refine their techniques, challenge conventions, and elevate artistic standards.

By recognizing the dangers and taking proactive measures to uphold the integrity of art criticism, we can ensure the preservation and elevation of artistic standards in an ever-evolving digital landscape.

Conclusion:
As artistic democracy thrives online, the role of art critics becomes increasingly indispensable. They navigate the vast digital landscape, curate quality art, foster dialogue, uphold standards, and nurture talent. In the pursuit of diverse and meaningful artistic experiences, art critics serve as pillars of wisdom, shaping public perception, and ensuring the continued growth and vitality of art in the age of the internet’s artistic democratization.

References:

1. Danto, Arthur C. The State of the Art. New York: Prentice Hall, 1987.
2. Eco, Umberto. The Role of the Critic: A Philosophical Reflection on Art Criticism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019.
3. Johnson, Claudia L. Understanding Media Criticism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
4. Schjeldahl, Peter. “The Critic’s Eyes: What Makes Art Beautiful?” The New Yorker, May 10, 2021. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/05/10/the-critics-eyes-what-makes-art-beautiful.
5. Steiner, Wendy. The Real Real Thing: The Model in the Mirror of Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.
6. Storr, Robert. “The Critic as Artist.” Art in America, June 1, 2019. https://www.artnews.com/art-in-america/aia-reviews/robert-storr-the-critic-as-artist-63374/.
7. Taylor, Brandon. Art Today. London: Laurence King Publishing, 2017.
8. Thornton, Sarah. Seven Days in the Art World. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2009.
9. UNESCO. “Cultural Diversity and Cultural Heritage: The Role of Critics.” Accessed June 25, 2023. https://en.unesco.org/creativity/policy-monitoring-platform/cultural-diversity-and-cultural-heritage-role-critics.